About Us Homeowners Haulers Educational Materials Recycling Facilities Home
     
  Board Meeting Schedule  
  Board of Directors Info  
  Senior Management Info  
  Citizen Advisory Committee  
  Press Releases/News  
  Public Records Policy  
      Information Request Form  
  Facilities: Locations, Directions, Hours  
  Awards & Recognition  
 
 
  Employment Opportunities  
  Employees Only  
 
 
  Annual Reports  
  Regulatory Reports  
  Search Tool  
 
  For more information contact us:
Lancaster County
Solid Waste Management Authority

1299 Harrisburg Pike
PO Box 4425
Lancaster, PA 17604
Phone: 717-397-9968
Fax: 717-397-9973
Email:
info@lcswma.org
 
 

Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting
September 13, 2002



NOTE: PUBLIC COMMENT WAS ENTERTAINED THROUGHOUT THE MEETING

The Board of Directors of the Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority met on Friday, September 13, 2002 at 7:30 a.m. at the Authority office, 1299 Harrisburg Pike, Lancaster, PA.

ATTENDANCE

Board of Directors present were: Chairman Ebel, Frost, Hammel, Houck, Kassees, Musser, Rosier, and Wood. Absent was Snoke. Staff present were: Warner, Forster, Lausch, Norris, Olson, Zorbaugh and Dougherty. Also present were: Solicitor George T. Brubaker of Hartman Underhill & Brubaker; Jim Klecko, Covanta Energy; Ad Crable, Lancaster New Era; and citizens as listed on the attached sign-in sheet.

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES

Mr. Ebel asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of the August 16, 2002 meeting. Mr. Frost moved that the minutes be approved. Mr. Wood seconded. Mr. Ebel called a vote; the motion passed unanimously.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Ebel opened the meeting for public comment. Members of the public who wished to speak were asked to step to the podium so that the comments would be recorded from the microphone.

Cabell Kladky (109 Chestnut Grove Road) asked about the plan for the properties purchased by the Authority in proximity to the Landfill.

Mr. Warner replied that the Authority hoped to develop a plan that would outline the Authority's interest in the properties and what course of action applied to each one.

Ms. Kladky asked about public input into the plan.

Mr. Warner said it would be presented in draft form at a board meeting, and available for public comment at that time.

Ms. Kladky asked about public input before the plan was drafted.

Mr. Warner replied that if members of the public had their own ideas in regards to the properties, they were welcome to submit them before the plan was drafted.

Ms. Kladky expressed concern about the Authority buying properties it didn't need.

Mr. Warner replied that the Authority didn't intend to be actively involved in real estate in the landfill area, exclusive of property included in the Consent Order, unless a need presented itself.

Ms. Kladky asked about how many trucks went from the transfer station to the landfill.

Mr. Warner replied that the amount of trucks varied.

Mr. Zorbaugh added that it could be an average of anywhere between 4 and 25 trucks per day.

Ms. Kladky asked about the type of waste in the trucks.

Mr. Zorbaugh answered that they carried municipal waste or construction/demolition waste.

Ms. Kladky asked why municipal waste was going to the landfill.

Mr. Warner answered that it was by-pass waste.

Ms. Kladky asked if out-of-county deliveries were made to the transfer station.

Mr. Warner replied that they weren't.

Ms. Kladky asked about how deliveries to the transfer station were recorded.

Mr. Warner answered that the waste coming to the transfer station is recorded by waste type (refuse or construction/demolition), as well as its originating municipality and the hauler.

Rhea Cosentino (232 Oak Road) asked if the Liquid Treatment Plant (LTP) had been discontinued.

Mr. Warner replied that it had been, and that regular customers had been notified. Mr. Warner noted that a few loads were accepted (in August) from Armstrong Ceiling Plant who had experienced an emergency situation.

Mr. Zorbaugh added that five loads came from Armstrong Ceiling Plant.

Mr. Warner said that as of July 1st, no liquid wastes had been received. Mr. Warner added that if an emergency arose with a regular customer needing to dispose of liquid waste, the Authority might accept it, if the plant could process the load economically.

Ms. Cosentino asked if Turkey Hill had been notified of the LTP's closing.

Mr. Warner replied that Kline's, who services Turkey Hill, had been notified.

O.W. Lacy (1306 Hillcrest Road) commented on his personal knowledge of, and commitment to, the Lancaster Malleable property. He expressed his opinion that should the Authority purchase the property, it would be a good thing for the community if it were included in a possible "greenway plan" along the Little Conestoga.

Mr. Warner replied that the Authority had also considered the opportunity, and would work with East Hempfield and Manheim Township.

Mr. Ebel recommended that Dr. Lacy talk to John Ahlfeld, the Executive Director of the Lancaster Intermunicipal Committee, as a possible resource for more information.

Mary Glazier (269 Chestnut Grove Road) commented that she believed Turkey Hill was not aware of the LTP's closing.

Ms. Glazier then asked about the tape from the July Board meeting.

Mr. Warner said the public was welcome to record the meetings themselves, but tapes made by the Authority were not considered, by law, to be a public document.

Ms. Glazier indicated that she would make a written request for the tape, so the Authority might provide an explanation for why the tape was not considered a public document.

Mr. Warner commented that the Authority's position was consistent with that of surrounding municipalities.

Mr. Brubaker added that in the Commonwealth court case, Tapco vs. Nevelle 1997 (cite 695 Atlantic second 460), a tape of a public meeting was found not to be a public document.

Ms. Glazier requested that, given her interest in it, the tape not be recorded over, or discarded.

Mr. Warner answered that the Authority would not record over it.

CHANGE IN MEETING DATE

Mr. Ebel announced the date of the October Board meeting was postponed from October 11, 2002 to October 18, 2002.

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - Mr. Warner reported on the following:

  • Hauler Agreements - A meeting was held on September 10th with about 25 MSW hauler representatives to discuss the new five-year Waste Processing/Disposal Agreements. Agreements will be generally the same with a few small changes that include:1) increasing the maximum price for Refuse and C/D waste; 2) addressing the new Act 90 $4.00 per ton Landfill surcharge; and 3) offering a minimal discount for accounts that are prepaid. New Agreements were mailed out on September 12th and signed Agreements are due back by October 11th. Board Approval of these agreements will be requested at the October 18th Board Meeting.

  • Lancaster Malleable Real Estate - Lancaster Malleable has offered for sale two tracts of land, comprising approximately 82 acres. The Authority's interest in purchasing this property is based on the fact that LARA, the precedent organization to LCSWMA, operated a sanitary waste disposal operation on it from 1955 until at least 1962. The Authority's interest is to control future use, thereby controlling liability associated with waste materials disposed on the properties.

    Ned Wehler, ARM Group Inc., completed an Environmental Site Assessment report on the prior activities of Lancaster Malleable at this location. Mr. Wehler presented a synopsis of that report which concluded that there are no substantive environmental risks associated with the previous activity of Lancaster Malleable.

Ms. Kladky asked about environmental issues regarding what LARA left on the property.

Mr. Wehler stated that to the best of his knowledge, there was no information to indicate an environmental problem.

Mr. Warner restated the Authority's goal in purchasing the property - to ensure that the property was not disturbed, to control the possible liability associated with it, and to avoid someone else purchasing it and attempting to develop it.

Mr. Ebel remarked that the downgradient wells didn't indicate a problem.

Ms. Kladky asked if the wells were related to LARA or Lancaster Malleable.

Mr. Wehler responded that they were associated with Lancaster Malleable.

Ms. Glazier asked if there had been well testing in regards to the LARA landfill.

Mr. Wehler said there had never been well testing; that none had been required as the site closed in 1962. He noted that the site was not subject to monitoring or solid waste regulation.

Ms. Glazier asked about the Authority's investigation on the Lancaster Malleable property vs. the LARA landfill.

Mr. Wehler replied that existing LARA information had been assembled, reviewed and evaluated.

Ms. Glazier asked about the Lancaster Malleable wells.

Mr. Wehler replied that drilling the wells was part of their closure filing with DEP. After that, they were permitted final, complete and clean closure.

Mr. Warner added that ARM Group Inc. was asked to look at Lancaster Malleable because it involved waste from a company unrelated to the Authority. The Authority wanted to make sure it was not assuming an additional risk based on Lancaster Malleable's activities.

Ms. Glazier asked about documents ARM Inc. consulted.

Mr. Warner replied that the information came from old maps and minutes.

Mr. Lacy asked about testing in the area of Manheim Township.

Mr. Wehler replied that no testing had been done in that area.

Mr. Warner commented that everything was done in full cooperation and knowledge of East Hempfield Township.

Ms. Hammel moved that Resolution No. 2002-7 be adopted. Seconded by Mr. Musser. Mr. Ebel read Resolution No. 2002-7. Mr. Ebel called a vote; the motion passed unanimously.

Standard and Poor's Rating - S&P recently reviewed the Authority's current underlying debt rating of "A-" and confirmed it. S&P also views the outlook of the Authority debt as "stable" over the intermediate and long term. Mr. Warner added that everyone should be very pleased with their confidence in our system.

FINANCE DEPARTMENT - Ms. Olson reported on the following:

  • LCSWMA Preliminary Results Actual vs. Budget - All Programs for the Month ended August 31, 2002.

  • LCSWMA Accounts Receivable Report and Past Due Detail Analysis as of August 31, 2002.

  • Approval of Disbursements - On motion by Mr. Frost, second by Mr. Rosier and unanimous vote, the Summary of Disbursements for August 2002 in the total amount of $3,685,538 were unanimously approved.

  • Annual Audit for the year ended December 31, 2002 - On motion by Mr. Wood, second by Ms. Hammel and unanimous vote, the Board approved Trout, Ebersole & Groff to perform the annual audit of the Authority for the year ended December 31, 2002.

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT - Mr. Lausch reported on the following:

  • Summary Tonnage Report - During August, total revenue tons were 50,367 and total tip fee revenues were $2,878,459, both of which were more than 5% over budget. Total MSW was 34,658 tons or 9.46% over budget. The Resource Recovery Facility received 30,845 tons and the Landfill received 19,352 revenue tons. We have now received 378,425 revenue tons year-to-date.

  • Residual Waste - During August, there were three Waste Service Agreements completed. Three-year Agreements were signed with Brush Wellman and Cryovac for the disposal of plant trash, and with Sun Chemical for the disposal of their ink waste.

  • Waste Transportation Safety Program (WTSP) - As a service to our customers, we downloaded the DEP's WTSP Municipal & Residual Waste Transporter Authorization Application (license application) and forwarded the information to those customers who have trucks registered for more than 17,000 pounds and/or trailers registered for more than 10,000 pounds. The deadline for licensing is December 27, 2002.

  • Municipal Waste Management Ordinances & Licensing Agreements - With the assistance of our Solicitor, we continue to review and update the model Municipal Waste Management Ordinances. These model ordinances are used by municipalities whether they establish a licensed hauler or single hauler program for curbside collection of refuse and recyclables. A licensing agreement with the haulers is a component of many of the municipal curbside programs, and since it appears that one of the intentions of Act 90 is to reduce or eliminate the licensing requirements imposed by municipalities on haulers now that the state is licensing, we are also reviewing municipal licensing.

  • Property and Casualty Insurance Renewals - After review and on motion by Mr. Frost, second by Mr. Wood and unanimous vote, the Board approved the placement of the property and casualty insurance through Murray Insurance Associates in accordance with renewal coverages as listed:
-Property Coverage with Hartford/Zurich for a premium amount of $466,500

-General Liability and Environmental Coverage with AIG for a premium amount of $61,152

-Excess Umbrella Coverage with AIG for a premium of $61,551

-Public Officials and Employment Practices Liability Coverage with AIG for a premium of $25,779

-Auto Coverage with St. Paul for a premium of $50,649

-Crime Coverage with Hartford for a premium of $1,278

-Worker's Compensation Coverage with Guard for a premium of $126,261

The total premiums for all the coverages this year is $793,170 compared to last year's premium of $614,375. Overall, this is a 29% increase over last year.

OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT - Mr. Zorbaugh reported on the following:

  • Administrative - Work continued on the 2003 Facility Budgets along with Capital Equipment and Project Budgets.

    Two employees represented the Authority and the PA Chapter of SWANA at the SWANA International Equipment Road-e-o in Cocoa Beach, Florida on August 22nd and 23rd.

    The Landfill Manager renewed his SWANA's "Manager of Landfill Operations" Certification. (MOLO) and the Assistant Manager obtained his MOLO certification.

    In order to address the issue of untarped vehicles traveling to the Frey Farm Landfill, staff has installed a large sign at the entrance to the facility stating all vehicles entering the facility are required to be tarped. We have also worked with Bill Laudien of Manor Township to include an article on tarping of vehicles in their newsletter.

  • Facility Operations - All facilities operated well and within regulatory compliance through the month of August.

    At the Landfill, a concrete approach slab to the inbound scale has been completed.

    At the Resource Recovery Facility, the average weight of RRF Ash Truck deliveries set an all time high at 22.2 tons. The trucks remain in compliance with weight limits and this increase in average weight translates into less truck traffic to the landfill facility.

  • Safety Program - During the month of August, there were no notable accidents to report at any of the facilities. The ECOPS met to review site safety inspection logs, select new quarterly safety training for the sites, and begin discussion on additional safety incentives to the employees.

    The red and green light system has been installed in bays one and two at the Transfer Station.

  • Purchase of Three New Transfer Trailers - After review and on motion by Mr. Houck, second by Mr. Musser and unanimous vote, the Board awarded the contract for the purchase of three new Aluminum Enclosed Ejector Transfer Trailers to Spector Manufacturing, Inc. for the bid price of $142,044.

Ms. Glazier commented that she appreciated efforts of the Authority staff to address the issue of untarped loads. Ms. Glazier suggested that the percentage of untarped loads be calculated.

Donna Bare (107 Chestnut Grove Road) remarked that she appreciated that a sign was posted at the Landfill with regard to untarped loads.

RRF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT - Mr. Forster reported on the following:

  • Site Operations - Electric revenues for August were $1,034,724, or $35,276 below budget. Revenues fell short due to several unscheduled outages that affected each of the three units.

    Mr. Forster explained that sometimes a tube leak does occur because in the lower reaches of the furnace the tubes are protected with insulation, not with Inconel steel, and occasionally, due to the volatile combustion in the furnace, insulation gets knocked off and exposes a tube making it more susceptible to leak development. Overall, despite the numerous tube incidents during the month, the boilers still operated 92.4% of the time.

  • Regulatory Activities - Mr. Weiss was not on site for an inspection during August.

    Authority site personnel completed required water sampling. A sample was taken from the stormwater detention pond and sent to Analytical Laboratories for testing. The sample is taken once per year following a substantial rainfall event. A sample was also taken from the facility's drinking water system. This sample was also sent to Analytical Laboratories to test for total coliform and nitrate. Results have not been received to date.

  • Other Activities - A facility audit was completed by Pfizer in Lititz. The audit went well, and Pfizer personnel were pleased with what they observed.

    Several representatives from the York County Solid Waste Authority visited the RRF to learn more about how the facility treats the secondary effluent it receives from Elizabethtown's wastewater treatment plant.

    Craig Davis of R. W. Beck will visit the RRF to do a plant audit on September 24 and 25.

    Mr. Forster added that he has received his Master's of Engineering Degree and thanked the Board for the Authority's Education Policy.


TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
- Mr. Norris reported on the following:

  • Capital Project Administration - Regarding the Creswell Re-use Study, new activities completed in August included the Fall Bioassay in Mann's Run. ARM is continuing to work through a tremendous amount of data that has been collected over the last several months. A meeting is scheduled next week with the Citizens Group and Manor Township to work on the landscape buffer.

  • Technical Support - DEP has approved the Authority Action Plan submittals for the radiation monitoring system. All radiation monitoring equipment has been ordered. Plans are to be up and running by mid-December.

  • CFI Property - The final remediation report was submitted to DEP in August. The Department has a 30-day period to accept comments on the document before they begin their review. After we receive approval from DEP, we will submit the DCED application for a grant to receive 75% of the cost associated with renovating the property.

  • Cell 5 Project - During August, the RFQ process was completed. Nineteen submittals were received from contractors interested in doing the work.

  • Facility Compliance and Assurance - The Authority's "trigger" of 3,000 cfs was reached with Susquehanna River flows going below this level on September 8th. Elizabethtown Borough continues to pump water from the Cornwall Open Pit Mine Pool which satisfies SRBC requirements of the Authority.

    Laboratory Analytical and Field Service Bid Documents for Professional Services tasks are being prepared. Staff recommendations should be available at the November Board meeting.

  • ISO 14001 Certification Project - Work continues on this project. A meeting is scheduled for October 1 with Gannett Fleming and we remain on schedule to complete the bulk of the work by year's end.

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

The CAC did not meet during the last month. The next meeting of the CAC will be held on October 23, 2002.

OTHER BUSINESS

Mr. Warner announced that Secretary Hess of DEP plans to visit the Authority today at 10 a.m. to affix Pennsylvania's first state WTSP licensing sticker on an Authority truck. DEP chose the Authority because of our history of compliance, as well as our being the first ones to have the application to the Department on day one and done correctly.

Mr. Warner announced that there would be an Executive Session to discuss a real estate issue and a minor matter of litigation.

Ms. Kladky asked for specifics on the Executive Session.

Mr. Brubaker replied that the litigation was in regards to a bankruptcy in Lancaster.

Mr. Warner commented that the real estate matter was one on which he needed the Board's guidance.

Ms. Glazier asked if the Board would reconvene after Executive Session.

Mr. Ebel replied that he didn't anticipate doing so.

EXECUTIVE SESSION

The Board went into Executive Session at 9:20 A.M. to discuss a real estate issue and a minor matter of litigation.

ADJOURNMENT

There was no other business to come before the Board. On motion by Mr. Musser, second by Mr. Frost and unanimous vote, the Board meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m.

APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY THIS 18th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2002.

Lester O. Houck, Secretary